Mrs. Partridge

My first novel is something different. I've been really impressed lately from some women, such Anorei Collins, for example.From their humongous bodies, and from the confidence they have with herselves. I loved it. So, I decided to write something about it: I'm proceeding with the translation and I'll post the first part in a few days.

Thanks everybody, Flower.

What this thing of breasts is all about?

If you are a big breasts lover like me, this question is the point.

I've been surfing around for so long, and I found hundreds of answers: yet, none of them could be considered exhaustive. The reason, probably, is that the matter is so personal and tied in the deep of our instinct; it's not easy at all to speak reasonably about it to other people. Above all if other people don't feel the way you feel.

So, just to add another point of view, I will post here the words of a great writer. I'm pretty sure he wasn't thinking about breasts while writing it, but in any piece of art you can find somehing new everyday.

So, to my eyes, these words fit in a way to what I think about it.

"...But is heaviness truly deplorable and lightness splendid?

The heaviest of burdens crushes us, we sink beneath it, it pins us to the ground. But in

the love poetry of every age, the woman longs to be weighed down by the man's body.

The heaviest of burdens is therefore simultaneously an image of life's most intense

fulfillment. The heavier the burden, the closer our lives come to the earth, the more real

and truthful they become.

Conversely, the absolute absence of a burden causes man to be lighter than air, to soar

into the heights, take leave of the earth and his earthly being, and become only half

real, his movements as free as they are insignificant.

What then shall we choose? Weight or lightness?

Parmenides posed this very question in the sixth century before Christ. He saw the

world divided into pairs of opposites:

light/darkness, fineness/coarseness, warmth/cold, being/non-being. One half of the

opposition he called positive (light, fineness, warmth, being), the other negative. We

might find this division into positive and negative poles childishly simple except for one

difficulty: which one is positive, weight or lightness?

Parmenides responded: lightness is positive, weight negative.Was he correct or not?

That is the question. The only certainty is: the lightness/weight opposition is the most

mysterious, most ambiguous of all."

Milan Kundera: the umbearable lightness of being.